One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 884,683 recorded births

Jonathan

#89 in the US in 2025

Where Jonathan stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#89boys’ names · US 2025

Jonathan was the 89th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 3,822 births.

peak 1988 · 24,349188019532025

Its moment was 1988, when 24,349 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#89US rank, 2025 (boys)
3,822US births in 2025
#15its best US rank, in 1988
1988peak year — 24,349 births
870,866US births since 1880
8,994NZ births since 1937
1,249E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Jonathan's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Jonathan was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Jonathan in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.06521305
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jonathan in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 39% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jonathan in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jonathan has been registered 8,994 times since 1937, peaking in 1982 with 311 births. It ranked #221 for boys in 2025 on 21 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.07091417
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jonathan in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jonathan in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Jonathan was registered 1,249 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 238 births. It ranked #296 for boys in 2025 on 153 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.03978
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jonathan in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#40318
1890#45816
1900#78511
1910#67719
1920#592111
1930#599103
1940#342276
1950#1631,538
1960#1183,343
1970#428,194
1980#2118,986
1990#1724,077
2000#2116,888
2010#2811,140
2020#704,757

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Jonathan most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California122,519
Texas74,817
New York72,559
Florida43,205
Illinois35,740
Pennsylvania35,197
Ohio30,008
North Carolina29,314
Georgia27,040
New Jersey26,874

Questions about Jonathan

How popular is the name Jonathan?

Jonathan ranked #89 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 3,822 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Jonathan most popular?

Jonathan peaked in 1988, when 24,349 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Jonathan rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Jonathan has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-39%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1988, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.