One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 1,365,225 recorded births

Andrew

#73 in the US in 2025

Where Andrew stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#73boys’ names · US 2025

Andrew was the 73rd most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 4,497 births.

peak 1987 · 36,206188019532025

Its moment was 1987, when 36,206 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#73US rank, 2025 (boys)
4,497US births in 2025
#5its best US rank, in 1988
1987peak year — 36,206 births
1,329,454US births since 1880
29,678NZ births since 1900
1,132E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Andrew's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Andrew was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Andrew in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.09701939
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Andrew in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 47% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Andrew in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Andrew has been registered 29,678 times since 1900, peaking in 1967 with 995 births. It ranked #346 for boys in 2025 on 13 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.018143628
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Andrew in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Andrew in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Andrew was registered 1,132 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 222 births. It ranked #334 for boys in 2025 on 127 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.03773
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Andrew in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#24644
1890#34575
1900#37718
1910#42884
1920#494,026
1930#623,056
1940#842,431
1950#684,932
1960#518,201
1970#3211,989
1980#1919,730
1990#733,673
2000#723,658
2010#1414,269
2020#526,068

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Andrew most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California153,875
New York109,648
Pennsylvania80,056
Texas77,711
Ohio66,095
Illinois61,716
Michigan54,443
Florida44,265
New Jersey43,952
Massachusetts38,794

Questions about Andrew

How popular is the name Andrew?

Andrew ranked #73 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 4,497 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Andrew most popular?

Andrew peaked in 1987, when 36,206 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Andrew rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Andrew has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-47%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1987, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.