One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 1,687,303 recorded births

Matthew

#32 in the US in 2025

Where Matthew stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#32boys’ names · US 2025

Matthew was the 32nd most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 7,003 births.

peak 1983 · 50,209188019532025

Its moment was 1983, when 50,209 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#32US rank, 2025 (boys)
7,003US births in 2025
#2its best US rank, in 1995
1983peak year — 50,209 births
1,654,075US births since 1880
24,480NZ births since 1900
3,168E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Matthew's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Matthew was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Matthew in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.014002801
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Matthew in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 39% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Matthew in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Matthew has been registered 24,480 times since 1900, peaking in 1983 with 764 births. It ranked #112 for boys in 2025 on 41 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.017223444
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Matthew in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Matthew in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Matthew was registered 3,168 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 633 births. It ranked #153 for boys in 2025 on 353 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0104208
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Matthew in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#116113
1890#16486
1900#161130
1910#158197
1920#151967
1930#204657
1940#198664
1950#1741,299
1960#616,925
1970#2420,185
1980#637,834
1990#344,826
2000#328,580
2010#1614,148
2020#308,142

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Matthew most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California181,793
New York135,084
Texas102,270
Pennsylvania94,257
Ohio83,229
Illinois81,953
Michigan69,138
Florida66,270
New Jersey59,912
Massachusetts54,724

Questions about Matthew

How popular is the name Matthew?

Matthew ranked #32 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 7,003 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Matthew most popular?

Matthew peaked in 1983, when 50,209 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Matthew rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Matthew has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-39%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1983, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.