One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 730,001 recorded births

Kathleen

#1,150 in the US in 2025

Where Kathleen stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,150girls’ names · US 2025

Kathleen was the 1,150th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 201 births.

peak 1951 · 26,716188019532025

Its moment was 1951, when 26,716 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,150US rank, 2025 (girls)
201US births in 2025
#9its best US rank, in 1949
1951peak year — 26,716 births
713,645US births since 1880
14,405NZ births since 1900
260E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Kathleen's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Kathleen was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Kathleen in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.07701541
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Kathleen in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 35% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Kathleen in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Kathleen has been registered 14,405 times since 1900, peaking in 1947 with 295 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.011192239
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Kathleen in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Kathleen in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Kathleen was registered 260 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 45 births. It ranked #997 for girls in 2025 on 34 births.

20200.08.517
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Kathleen in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#35221
1890#239105
1900#170321
1910#131622
1920#913,158
1930#843,074
1940#405,697
1950#1025,706
1960#2716,085
1970#457,410
1980#823,857
1990#923,670
2000#2041,585
2010#594495
2020#1,004253

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Kathleen most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York91,651
Pennsylvania62,495
California60,932
Illinois48,681
Ohio40,561
Massachusetts39,421
Michigan38,756
New Jersey35,950
Wisconsin26,902
Minnesota21,350

Questions about Kathleen

How popular is the name Kathleen?

Kathleen ranked #1,150 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 201 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Kathleen most popular?

Kathleen peaked in 1951, when 26,716 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Kathleen rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Kathleen has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-35%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1951, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.