One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 888,936 recorded births

Sandra

#1,207 in the US in 2025

Where Sandra stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,207girls’ names · US 2025

Sandra was the 1,207th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 188 births.

peak 1947 · 34,779188019532025

Its moment was 1947, when 34,779 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,207US rank, 2025 (girls)
188US births in 2025
#5its best US rank, in 1947
1947peak year — 34,779 births
875,531US births since 1904
10,591NZ births since 1938
122E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Sandra's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Sandra was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Sandra in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.010082017
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Sandra in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 35% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Sandra in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Sandra has been registered 10,591 times since 1938, peaking in 1963 with 574 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.010972194
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Sandra in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Sandra in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Sandra was registered 122 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 27 births. It ranked #2,439 for girls in 2025 on 11 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.05.010
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Sandra in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1910#1,6349
1920#687112
1930#392298
1940#1016,153
1950#828,896
1960#1124,572
1970#2711,246
1980#804,002
1990#1342,343
2000#2571,268
2010#514581
2020#1,099222

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Sandra most often since 1904. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California80,699
New York60,335
Texas58,588
Illinois51,864
Pennsylvania51,402
Ohio47,098
Michigan43,038
North Carolina24,280
Massachusetts24,278
Wisconsin23,874

Questions about Sandra

How popular is the name Sandra?

Sandra ranked #1,207 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 188 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Sandra most popular?

Sandra peaked in 1947, when 34,779 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Sandra rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Sandra has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-35%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1947, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.