One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 1,469,119 recorded births

Linda

#902 in the US in 2025

Where Linda stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#902girls’ names · US 2025

Linda was the 902nd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 294 births.

peak 1947 · 99,692188019532025

Its moment was 1947, when 99,692 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#902US rank, 2025 (girls)
294US births in 2025
#1its best US rank, in 1947
1947peak year — 99,692 births
1,455,143US births since 1880
10,073NZ births since 1900
147E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Linda's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Linda was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Linda in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.028335667
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Linda in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 27% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Linda in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Linda has been registered 10,073 times since 1900, peaking in 1959 with 423 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.010372075
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Linda in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Linda in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Linda was registered 147 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2023 with 27 births. It ranked #1,892 for girls in 2025 on 15 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.05.311
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Linda in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#30527
1890#34854
1900#293125
1910#335137
1920#352348
1930#299492
1940#818,370
1950#180,433
1960#337,316
1970#388,731
1980#1102,806
1990#1751,661
2000#357851
2010#614480
2020#814334

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Linda most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California114,963
New York114,109
Pennsylvania89,088
Texas84,058
Ohio79,389
Illinois78,467
Michigan64,393
North Carolina44,003
New Jersey40,860
Massachusetts40,707

Questions about Linda

How popular is the name Linda?

Linda ranked #902 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 294 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Linda most popular?

Linda peaked in 1947, when 99,692 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Linda rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Linda has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-27%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1947, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.